Contact puzzlemix

Show only:

Click on column headings to sort.

Get

BrainedUp.com
daily online brain training
Cutting-edge brain training created by Dr Gareth Moore
Think faster, better,

Sudoku Xtra 24
logic puzzle compendium
Printed puzzles from Dr Gareth Moore

### Comments and Results for 'Non-consecutive Sudoku 192'

 State Type Title Size Played Avg time Rating (#users) Yours Your best Published Expires Non-consecutive Sudoku 192 9x9 123 21:47 Mild (86) Subscribers only 15th Jan - Show full chart rankings for Non-consecutive Sudoku 192
 Your puzzle statistics First solution time distribution Overall puzzle statistics Log in (or create a free user)to store and view your puzzle statistics Slowest 10% not shown0:00 36:36 Solution time without 'show wrong' Slowest 10% not shown0:00 32:26 Unaided first solution time Slowest 10% not shown0:00 32:26 Completed by 106 users Best time without any aid 7:38 by Coalchaser Best time with major aid 5:13 by purrs Best time with show wrongor multiple sessions 1:56 by Cate-Lyn Average solve time with no or minor aid 20:34 Average difficulty rating - all players 3.3/10.0 Average difficulty rating - no aid 3.6/10.0 Average difficulty rating - minor aid 5.5/10.0 Average difficulty rating - major aid 2.0/10.0 Average difficulty rating - show wrong ormultiple sessions 3.0/10.0
Posted 15th Jan 2020 at 13:59
janeymo Daily subscriber Rated puzzle: Hard Best completion time: 16:19 Time on first attempt: 21:02
Good to see one of these back again!
Posted 15th Jan 2020 at 14:03
tishtosh Daily subscriber Has started but not yet finished this puzzle
The rules given are for Consecutive Sudoku. This looks like a normal Sudoku - is there a difference?
Posted 15th Jan 2020 at 20:37
Elisabeth Daily subscriber Rated puzzle: Easy Completion time: 19:21
Yes, tishtosh! As the name implies no number may be next to it's consecutive(s) anywhere. Then of course the usual sudoku rules apply.
Posted 18th Jan 2020 at 06:53
tishtosh Daily subscriber Has started but not yet finished this puzzle
Thanks Elisabeth. Makes sense!