Grizzlybare Rated puzzle: Moderate Completion time: 19:27 Used 'valid marks' Used 'show wrong moves'
Very nice puzzle...
Posted 9th Aug 2014 at 14:38
RThorner Rated puzzle: Moderate Completion time: 1:25:28 Used 'remove' Used 'show invalid' Used 'show wrong moves' Used 'check puzzle' when incorrect
Really stuck on this one for the first time in a while. Had to use hypotheses rather than pure logic at one stage. Nice puzzle, thank you.
Posted 17th Aug 2014 at 21:13
ClearlyToughpick Rated puzzle: Moderate Best completion time: 10:23 Time on first attempt: 55:16 Used 'valid marks' Used 'auto remove' Used 'show invalid' Used 'show wrong moves' Used 'check puzzle' when incorrect
I couldn't solve this with logic: had to use trial and error. If you did manage with logic alone, please tell me how! Thanks
Posted 4th Sep 2014 at 19:11
joshuazucker Rated puzzle: Hard Completion time: 10:45
I can place three 5s, three 4s, and two 3s relatively easily (let me know if you want explanation of how to get this far!)
Then, where's the 1 on the bottom row? If it's in front of the 4 clue, that column goes 1 3 2 as we work up, which means row 3 goes 1 5 3.
If it's in the middle of the bottom row, then the 5 must be immediately above it, and so the second number in row 3 is still a 5.
And since the only possibilities for the second number in row 3 are 1 and 5, that means that this spot is a 5.
The rest of the solve is pretty straightforward from there, I think?
There are probably some other logic paths that give the same conclusion, that the second number in row 3 must be a 5.
Posted 6th Sep 2014 at 14:13 Last edited by JoergWausW 6th Sep 2014 at 17:10
JoergWausW Daily subscriber Best completion time: 5:47 Time on first attempt: 19:08 Used 'check puzzle' when incorrect
Just looked at the comments here, and I redid this one to figure out the trick. Took me a while (and I think I did trial and error when I first solved it, too).
Do as far as joshuazucker said in his first sentence. Then eliminate all but one 3 in column 2, using the 3 clue at row 4.
Sorry: You must log in (create a free user) in order to be able to post comments on this puzzle.
You can however view other players' statistics and comments in the tables above.
Post comment
Key
A yellow/light blue highlight in the time distribution charts highlights your time, where relevant.
Rating scores out of 10.0 show the average difficulty rating chosen by users, where 1.0 is "Easy" and 10.0 is "Hard".
If a puzzle is opened more than once, including by loading from a saved position, then this is potentially a significant aid so it is listed as being completed with 'multiple sessions' for the purpose of the best time/average rating displays above.
Minor aid is defined as no more than one use of 'Check solution' when incomplete and/or no more than one use of 'Check solution' when wrong; and/or using highlighting aids (show repeated digits, show broken inequalities and show valid/invalid placements [slitherlink] only). Major aid is any and all other use of the solving aids except for 'show wrong'.
Then, where's the 1 on the bottom row? If it's in front of the 4 clue, that column goes 1 3 2 as we work up, which means row 3 goes 1 5 3.
If it's in the middle of the bottom row, then the 5 must be immediately above it, and so the second number in row 3 is still a 5.
And since the only possibilities for the second number in row 3 are 1 and 5, that means that this spot is a 5.
The rest of the solve is pretty straightforward from there, I think?
There are probably some other logic paths that give the same conclusion, that the second number in row 3 must be a 5.
Last edited by JoergWausW 6th Sep 2014 at 17:10
Do as far as joshuazucker said in his first sentence. Then eliminate all but one 3 in column 2, using the 3 clue at row 4.
You can however view other players' statistics and comments in the tables above.